🤖 AI Summary
Overview
This episode explores the complexities behind the rising autism diagnosis rates, the evolution of its definition, and the unintended consequences of broadening the autism spectrum. It also delves into the tensions within the autism community over resources, representation, and the proposal for a new category, profound autism.
Notable Quotes
- The whole idea of autism awareness, those are things that are really good, but I do think that we have contributed unwittingly to having diagnoses that are very complicated.
– Kathy Lord, reflecting on the unintended consequences of broadening the autism spectrum.
- Diagnoses matter because they are the key to getting the specific medical attention that you need, to getting the specific services at school that are going to help support you.
– Azeen Ghorayshi, on the stakes tied to autism diagnoses.
- The message that sends is that the people who don't have profound autism don't have autism at all.
– Azeen Ghorayshi, on concerns about splitting the autism spectrum.
🧩 The Rising Autism Diagnosis Rates
- Autism diagnoses in the U.S. have risen from 1 in 150 children in 2000 to 1 in 31 today.
- Azeen Ghorayshi explains that while environmental factors like pollution and parental age may play a role, the primary driver is the expanding definition of autism.
- The broadening of diagnostic criteria has led to more people being included under the autism spectrum, not necessarily a true increase in prevalence.
📜 The Evolution of Autism's Definition
- Autism was first recognized as a diagnosis in 1980 with a narrow definition, focusing on severe symptoms like lack of responsiveness and language delays.
- In 1994, the criteria were loosened, and Asperger's syndrome was introduced to capture milder cases.
- By 2013, the DSM combined all subcategories into a single diagnosis: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This change aimed to unify the spectrum but created challenges in addressing diverse needs.
⚖️ Resource Allocation and Community Tensions
- The expanded spectrum has led to competition for limited resources, particularly in schools and research.
- Families of children with severe autism report difficulty accessing appropriate services, with some schools deeming their children too autistic.
- Research has shifted focus to milder cases, leaving those with severe autism underrepresented.
- Tensions have emerged between parents of severely autistic children and self-advocates with milder autism, who often have differing priorities and perspectives.
🏠 The Debate Over Profound Autism
- Kathy Lord and others propose a new category, profound autism,
to address the needs of individuals with severe disabilities requiring round-the-clock care.
- This proposal aims to ensure better resource allocation but raises concerns about further stigmatization and dividing the autism community.
- Critics worry it could create a perception of real autism
versus not real autism,
potentially undermining support for those on the milder end of the spectrum.
🌈 The Neurodiversity Movement and Cultural Shifts
- The neurodiversity movement has reframed autism as a difference rather than a disease, emphasizing strengths like unique perspectives and problem-solving abilities.
- Public figures like Elon Musk and media portrayals in shows like The Big Bang Theory have contributed to reducing stigma and celebrating neurodiversity.
- However, this cultural embrace has also complicated the conversation around the needs of those with severe autism, who may not benefit from this broader acceptance.
AI-generated content may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as a sole source of truth.
📋 Episode Description
Once primarily limited to severely disabled people, autism began to be viewed as a spectrum that included children and adults far less impaired. Along the way, the disorder also became an identity, embraced by college graduates and even by some of the world’s most successful people, like Elon Musk and Bill Gates.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has called the steep rise in autism cases “an epidemic.” He blames theories of causality that mainstream scientists reject — like vaccines and, more recently, Tylenol — and has instructed the C.D.C. to abandon its longstanding position that vaccines do not cause autism.
Today, Azeen Ghorayshi explains what’s really driving the increase in diagnoses.
Guest: Azeen Ghorayshi, a science reporter for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Should the autism spectrum be split apart?
- There are no easy answers for parents of children with autism.
Photo: Eric Gay/Associated Press
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.