🤖 AI Summary
Overview
This episode delves into the controversial and extreme online subculture of looksmaxing,
where young men obsessively pursue physical perfection through drastic measures, including hormone use, experimental drugs, and even self-inflicted physical alterations. The discussion explores the rise of the movement's figurehead, Clavicular,
and examines the broader cultural implications of a society increasingly fixated on appearance and status.
Notable Quotes
- If I could accelerate my progress in the gym with a simple pharmaceutical intervention, then of course I'm gonna do it.
— Brayden “Clavicular” Peters, on his decision to start testosterone therapy at age 14.
- It becomes harder and harder to tell young men that the way they look doesn’t matter when the culture has become so removed and image-based.
— Joseph Bernstein, on the societal pressures fueling the looksmaxing movement.
- Do I have time to waste having sex, which is going to gain me nothing? It just doesn’t seem very logical to me.
— Brayden “Clavicular” Peters, on prioritizing aesthetics over personal relationships.
💉 The Extreme Practices of Looksmaxing
- Joseph Bernstein explains that looksmaxing involves a spectrum of practices aimed at enhancing physical appearance, ranging from common self-care routines to extreme measures like taking experimental drugs, hormones, and even tapping facial bones with hammers to alter bone structure.
- The community is rooted in the incel subculture but diverges by promoting the idea that physical shortcomings can be overcome through extreme interventions.
- Looksmaxers obsess over specific beauty standards, often idolizing the features of white male celebrities like Matt Bomer, and measure facial proportions with mathematical precision.
🧪 The Rise of Clavicular
- Brayden “Clavicular” Peters, a 20-year-old influencer, has become the face of the looksmaxing movement. He gained fame by experimenting with extreme beauty-enhancing techniques and sharing his results online.
- Clavicular’s controversial actions, such as injecting fat-dissolving peptides into his girlfriend’s face on a live stream and admitting to using meth for appetite suppression, have drawn both fascination and criticism.
- His rise to prominence highlights the role of the attention economy, where controversy and shock value drive virality.
📊 The Obsession with Metrics and Aesthetics
- Clavicular’s fixation on numerical measurements of beauty, such as mid-face ratios and clavicle width, reflects the movement’s hyper-quantified approach to appearance.
- He meticulously tracks his use of a wide array of substances, including testosterone, experimental peptides, and hair loss drugs, to achieve his aesthetic goals.
- Despite the risks, including infertility, Clavicular prioritizes physical perfection over personal health and relationships, viewing beauty as the ultimate path to status.
🌐 Cultural Reflections and Gender Parallels
- Natalie Kitroeff draws parallels between looksmaxing and the long-standing societal pressures on women to conform to beauty standards through painful and invasive interventions.
- Joseph Bernstein notes that while men historically faced stigma for caring about their appearance, the rise of image-based platforms like Instagram and TikTok has normalized and amplified these pressures for young men.
- The movement reflects a broader cultural shift toward valuing physical appearance and status above other qualities, driven by the visual nature of modern digital culture.
⚠️ The Dark Side of Looksmaxing
- The looksmaxing forums are rife with nihilistic and often racist rhetoric, with young men expressing fatalistic views about their worth being tied solely to their appearance.
- Families have reported devastating impacts on their children who become deeply entrenched in this culture, internalizing harmful and unrealistic beauty standards.
- Clavicular’s growing influence raises concerns about the normalization of extreme interventions and the broader societal implications of a culture increasingly obsessed with physical perfection.
AI-generated content may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as a sole source of truth.
📋 Episode Description
If you’ve spent any time on social media recently, you’ve probably come across a video of a young, square-jawed influencer calling himself Clavicular. He has become the face of an internet subculture called looksmaxxing, in which men do almost anything — like taking steroids and hormones or bashing their jaws with a hammer — to try to become more handsome.
In this episode, Natalie Kitroeff talks with reporter Joseph Bernstein about the world of looksmaxxing and how what might seem like a fringe phenomenon is actually the culmination of a digital culture that rewards physical perfection with status and algorithmic power.
On Today’s Episode
Joseph Bernstein covers digital subcultures for the Styles desk at The New York Times.
Background Reading
Young Men Seek Answers to an Age-Old Question: How to Be Hot
The Suffix That Tells Us to Ruthlessly Optimize Everything
Photo Credit: Cassidy Araiza for The New York Times
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.