🤖 AI Summary
Overview
This episode delves into the controversy surrounding a leaked U.S. peace plan for Ukraine, which many criticized as being overly favorable to Russia. The discussion explores the political fallout in Ukraine, the diplomatic missteps by the U.S., and the broader implications for Ukrainian leadership and international relations.
Notable Quotes
- The idea that we're just going to give up everything we've been fighting for? Nothing? No.
– Kim Barker, on Ukrainian reactions to the peace plan.
- The Europeans felt like this draft of a peace accord not only sold Ukraine down the river, it sold their own security down the river.
– David E. Sanger, on European concerns about the plan.
- President Trump doesn’t talk in terms of principles. He says, just tell me what it will take to get it done.
– David E. Sanger, on the administration’s approach to diplomacy.
🕊️ The Controversial Peace Plan
- The leaked 28-point peace plan was widely criticized for aligning closely with Russian demands, including barring Ukraine from NATO, reducing its military, and ceding territory.
- Ukrainians viewed the plan as capitulation,
sparking outrage and a sense of betrayal, especially given the ongoing war and civilian suffering.
- The plan was developed with significant input from Russian representatives before Ukrainian or European officials were consulted, leading to accusations of diplomatic malpractice.
💥 Political Fallout in Ukraine
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faced mounting pressure due to a corruption scandal involving embezzlement of funds meant for war-related infrastructure.
- The scandal, dramatized through a series of anti-corruption agency videos, eroded public trust and emboldened opposition parties.
- Despite his weakened position, Zelenskyy rejected the peace plan, rallying Ukrainians with a defiant stance against perceived U.S. and Russian pressure.
🇺🇸 U.S. Diplomatic Missteps
- The Trump administration’s approach mirrored its Gaza negotiations, prioritizing speed over inclusivity, which alienated European allies and Ukrainians.
- Key figures like Jared Kushner and Marco Rubio played central roles, but the process revealed internal divisions within the administration.
- The plan’s leak and subsequent backlash forced revisions, including removing clauses limiting Ukraine’s military and NATO presence, but damaged trust with allies.
🌍 European and Global Reactions
- European leaders, particularly Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz, criticized the plan for undermining NATO and European security.
- The exclusion of European input in the initial stages of negotiation deepened frustrations, highlighting a recurring pattern in U.S. foreign policy under Trump.
- Russia, initially pleased with the draft, grew wary as revisions made the plan less favorable to its interests.
⚖️ Zelenskyy’s Balancing Act
- Zelenskyy’s rejection of the plan marked a return to his wartime leadership persona, emphasizing Ukraine’s sovereignty and dignity.
- However, he remains in a precarious position, needing to maintain U.S. support while resisting pressure to accept unfavorable terms.
- The episode underscores the broader challenge of achieving peace without compromising Ukraine’s territorial integrity or international alliances.
AI-generated content may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as a sole source of truth.
📋 Episode Description
When President Trump’s peace plan to end the war in Ukraine was leaked last week, many felt as though Russia had written the proposal, and to a large degree, it reflected the Kremlin’s demands. The plan set off a global outcry that has forced American officials to revise their approach in the days since.
Kim Barker and David E. Sanger explain the process that led to the contentious plan and why it comes at a vulnerable moment for Ukrainian leadership.
Guest:
- Kim Barker, a reporter for The New York Times covering the war in Ukraine.
- David E. Sanger, the White House and national security correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Analysis: Mr. Trump offers a Ukraine peace plan the Kremlin can love.
- To many Ukrainians, the U.S. proposal looks like “capitulation.”
Photo: Tyler Hicks/The New York Times
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.