It's Time To Let Star Trek Die

It's Time To Let Star Trek Die

February 20, 2026 7 min
📺 Watch Now

🤖 AI Summary

Overview

This episode critiques the current state of the Star Trek franchise, focusing on the perceived failures of the latest series, Starfleet Academy. The speaker argues that the franchise has lost its way under its current leadership, suggesting that it should be shelved to allow for a creative reset in the future.

Notable Quotes

- Star Trek in its current form needs to die because it's doing nothing except tarnishing its own legacy by continuing to exist.

- If a company produces a product that basically everyone hates, it's important to let them know just how badly they've [__] up. Otherwise, they're going to keep doing it because you're giving them no incentive to change.

- The idea of shelving this franchise and just letting it rest for 10 or 15 years sounds like exactly what it needs.

🎬 The Failure of *Starfleet Academy*

- The series has been a commercial and critical disappointment, failing to chart on Nielsen ratings and receiving poor audience scores on major review platforms.

- The first episode, released for free on YouTube, garnered fewer views than the speaker's own videos, highlighting its lack of public interest.

- The speaker criticizes the show's defenders, who attribute its failure to review bombing or claim it was made for a new generation rather than traditional fans.

💥 Critique of Current Star Trek Leadership

- Alex Kurtzman and his team at Secret Hideout are blamed for the franchise's decline, accused of prioritizing the message over quality storytelling.

- The speaker argues that the current creative team has failed to grow the fanbase, elevate the brand, or generate profits for Paramount.

- The lack of compelling characters, writing, and production quality in recent Star Trek shows is seen as evidence of their creative failure.

🛑 The Case for Letting Star Trek Rest

- The speaker compares the franchise to a shambling zombie, suggesting it needs a break to heal and rebuild its legacy.

- A hiatus of 10-15 years is proposed to allow nostalgia to build and for a new generation of creatives to take over.

- The speaker believes continuing the franchise in its current form only tarnishes its legacy further.

📉 The Consequences of Mediocrity

- The speaker rejects the idea of supporting subpar content to keep the franchise alive, arguing that it only enables more poor-quality productions.

- They emphasize the importance of holding creators accountable to encourage better storytelling and respect for the franchise's legacy.

- The current trajectory is seen as unsustainable, with the franchise failing to resonate with audiences or generate meaningful revenue.

🔄 Hope for a Future Revival

- While the speaker is pessimistic about the current state of Star Trek, they express hope that the franchise could return stronger after a significant hiatus.

- They envision a future where new writers and creatives, unburdened by the mistakes of the current team, could restore the franchise to its former glory.

AI-generated content may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon as a sole source of truth.

📋 Video Description

Its been a good run, but if Startfleet Academy has proven anything, its that Star Trek as a brand is done. It's cooked. It's over. And that gives me no pleasure to say, but the best thing to do now is let the franchise rest for a decade or two, and come back with a whole new team of creatives.